Hello! Welcome to my portfolio website. I’m Rajnikant Dhar Dwivedi, a passionate developer and student from India. This post delves into a critical question for the Indian technology landscape: Why, despite its vast pool of tech talent and a rapidly expanding AI ecosystem, has India not yet produced an AI giant of comparable global stature?

Why India’s AI Landscape, Despite its Boom, Hasn’t Yet Produced a Global Giant

The global artificial intelligence arena is currently dominated by a select few titans—companies like OpenAI, Google, and Baidu—that have pushed the boundaries of what AI can achieve. Their names resonate with foundational model breakthroughs and widespread technological adoption. This global narrative, however, prompts an intriguing question for observers of the Indian technology landscape: Why, despite its vast pool of tech talent, burgeoning digital adoption, and a rapidly expanding AI ecosystem, has India not yet produced an AI giant of comparable global stature?

India’s journey in AI presents a fascinating paradox. On one hand, the nation is witnessing an undeniable surge in AI activity, characterized by a vibrant and rapidly growing ecosystem. On the other, it has yet to birth a company that commands the global influence and technological leadership seen in the United States or China. This analysis delves into the underlying factors contributing to this situation, exploring both India’s formidable strengths and the systemic challenges that currently impede the emergence of its own AI behemoths.

The Vibrant Indian AI Ecosystem: A Foundation of Growth

India’s AI landscape is far from nascent; it is a dynamic and rapidly evolving environment demonstrating significant growth and innovation. The sheer volume of activity underscores a robust foundation for future development.

Startup Surge and Innovation

The generative AI (GenAI) startup ecosystem in India has experienced remarkable expansion. The number of GenAI startups grew by an impressive 3.6 times, from just over 66 in the first half of 2023 to more than 240 by the first half of 2024.[1, 2] This growth is broad-based, encompassing various segments of the AI stack. The country has seen the emergence of over 17 native Large Language Models (LLMs) within a year, alongside a 3.2-fold increase in applications and a 4.6-fold surge in services.[1] Notably, GenAI assistants account for 80% of this increase in applications, reflecting a strong focus on practical, user-facing solutions.[1]

The entrepreneurial spirit is evident, with nearly 75% of GenAI startups reporting revenue generation by H1 2024, a significant jump from only 22% in H1 2023.[1] This indicates a rapid move towards commercialization. Furthermore, India’s deep-tech sector, which includes AI, witnessed a remarkable 78% surge in funding in 2024 compared to the previous year, with application-focused AI ventures attracting the largest share of investments.[3] This suggests a strong appetite for integrating AI into existing business processes and delivering immediate value.

However, a closer look reveals a nuanced picture. While a large proportion of startups are generating revenue, approximately 80% report earning less than $100,000 annually.[1] Moreover, funding for GenAI applications, despite the volume of new ventures, saw only a modest 1.2% increase, indicating a potential “volume-value gap” in the GenAI assistants category.[1] This suggests that while there is a boom in startup creation, many are struggling to achieve significant revenue or attract the large-scale funding necessary for exponential growth. The limited financial success for the majority of these application-focused ventures, particularly those built on top of existing models rather than developing proprietary foundational ones, can restrict their unique value proposition and long-term defensibility. This trajectory often leads to widespread adoption and application-level innovation rather than foundational breakthroughs, which is a different path compared to global AI leaders.

Talent Pool and Adoption

India possesses a substantial human capital advantage. The nation boasts over 600,000 AI professionals, and its AI-skilled workforce experienced a remarkable 14-fold increase between 2016 and 2023.[4, 5] This rapid growth has positioned India as one of the top five fastest-growing AI talent hubs globally, alongside countries like Singapore and Canada.[4] This demographic dividend and a strong STEM education system provide a fertile ground for AI development.

The adoption of AI within Indian enterprises and among employees is also notably high. According to reports, 70% of Indian employees utilized AI at work in 2024, a significant increase from 50% just a year prior.[4] Furthermore, 80% of Indian companies consider AI a core strategic priority, surpassing the global average of 75%.[4] This high willingness to adopt AI at both individual and enterprise levels creates a robust domestic market and a conducive environment for AI deployment.

Government Vision and Support

The Indian government has demonstrated a clear strategic intent to foster a robust AI ecosystem through significant policy initiatives and financial commitments. The IndiaAI Mission, approved in 2024 with a substantial corpus of ₹10,300 crore (approximately $1.2 billion) over five years, is a cornerstone of this strategy.[3, 4, 5]

Key initiatives under this mission include:

• National AI compute infrastructure: Plans are underway to provide access to over 10,000 GPUs for AI model training and research.[3, 5] Specifically, 18,693 Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) have been acquired for domestic model training, aiming to establish one of the most extensive AI compute infrastructures globally.[4, 6]
• Affordable Compute Access: A new common compute facility is set to launch, offering highly subsidized GPU power at ₹100 per hour, significantly lower than the global average of $2.5-$3 per hour.[3, 4] This aims to democratize access to crucial computing resources for researchers and startups.
• IndiaAI Dataset Platform: This platform is designed to ensure seamless access to high-quality, non-personal datasets, crucial for training robust AI models and reducing biases.[3]
• Centres of Excellence (CoE): Established in critical sectors like healthcare, agriculture, and sustainable cities, with a new CoE for AI in education also announced.[3, 4]
• Development of indigenous foundational AI models: Initiatives like BharatGen, the world’s first government-funded multimodal LLM, are tailored to Indian needs, focusing on Indian languages and digital public infrastructure.[3, 7]
• Digital India BHASHINI: An AI-led language translation platform designed to enable easy access to the internet and digital services in Indian languages.[4]

The government’s proactive stance and significant financial commitment signal a clear intent to address foundational needs like compute and data, laying a strong groundwork for the ecosystem’s growth.

The Missing Links: Key Challenges Hindering the Rise of Giants

Despite the vibrant ecosystem and government support, several systemic challenges act as significant impediments, preventing Indian AI companies from scaling to become global giants. These “missing links” are often interconnected, creating a complex web of constraints.

The Capital Conundrum: Lack of Patient, Deep-Tech Investment

A critical barrier to scaling AI ventures in India is the nature and quantum of investment. Indian GenAI startups experienced a “tepid funding increase of 1.25X,” primarily limited to early-stage rounds.[2] While domestic capital is increasingly contributing to the AI funding ecosystem, fostering a hyperlocal network [3], there remains a “significant shortage of patient capital for scaling infrastructure-heavy AI ventures”.[6] The costs associated with training large-scale models, especially GPU-heavy ones, can run into millions of dollars, far beyond what early-stage funding typically provides.[6]

The disparity in private AI investment between India and global leaders is stark. In 2024, global private venture capital funding for AI startups reached $132 billion, with the USA attracting $109 billion and China $9.3 billion. India, in contrast, stood at the 12th spot globally, receiving only $1.2 billion in private AI investments.[7] Cumulatively, from 2013 to 2024, India’s total private AI investment was $11.29 billion, still less than what the US invested in a single year in 2024.[7]

This funding landscape, which favors early-stage, application-focused ventures, lacks the “patient, deep-tech” capital needed for the massive, long-term investments required to build foundational models or large-scale AI infrastructure, which are hallmarks of global AI giants. Furthermore, many Indian startups find themselves stuck in “Free Proof of Concept (PoC) Purgatory,” where enterprises demand months of unpaid pilot work before considering a contract, draining resources and delaying market penetration.[6] This fundamental difference in capital availability and deployment significantly limits the ability of Indian companies to compete at the frontier AI level.

Compute Power Deficit: The Infrastructure Bottleneck

Access to high-performance computing resources is non-negotiable for building and scaling AI giants. India faces a substantial deficit in this area, lacking sufficient advanced Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) and dedicated AI cloud platforms.[8] This limitation often forces Indian AI startups to depend on costly foreign cloud computing providers, raising concerns about both expense and data security.[8]

The current state of India’s compute infrastructure lags significantly behind global leaders. India holds only 2% of the global AI computing power, with just 33 supercomputers, none of which are dedicated solely to AI use. In comparison, both the USA and China possess over a hundred supercomputers each, many specifically designed for AI applications.[7] India’s top-ranked machine, AIRAWAT, is positioned at only 136th globally in terms of speed and performance.[7]

Despite the IndiaAI Mission’s promise of acquiring 18,693 GPUs, their deployment faces “logistical bottlenecks”.[6] To put this in perspective, one US hyperscaler region alone operates over 40,000 H100 GPUs, while India struggles to deploy even 15,000.[6] This severe deficit in indigenous, high-end compute infrastructure is a fundamental constraint. Training large, complex AI models, akin to OpenAI’s GPT-4 or Google’s Gemini, demands immense computational power that India currently lacks at scale. This directly impacts the ability to innovate at the foundational model level and compete globally. Compounding this, India imports 95% of its semiconductors, creating a significant dependency.[9]

The Talent Gap Beyond Numbers: Quality vs. Quantity and Brain Drain

While India boasts a large pool of AI professionals, the challenge lies not merely in the quantity but in the type of talent and its retention. India faces a “shortage of skilled AI professionals,” particularly those with advanced research and development expertise.[8, 10] Only 15-20% of the current workforce is equipped with specialized AI skills, and demand continues to surge faster than supply.[10, 11]

India’s limited research infrastructure and funding prevent it from building foundational AI models on par with leading nations, leading to a predominant focus on application development rather than core AI innovation.[10] This impacts the kind of talent developed and retained. Brain drain is a significant issue; 7% of Indian AI graduates emigrate, primarily to the United States, while China manages to retain 94% of its talent through state incentives.[9] Furthermore, a stark disparity exists in the pursuit of advanced AI education: only 0.08% of engineers in India pursue AI PhDs, compared to 4.2% in China.[9] This scarcity of advanced AI research talent, coupled with its outward migration, hinders the creation of the deep expertise necessary for building “giant” AI capabilities.

Policy Implementation and IP: Gaps in Support and Protection

While India is actively developing AI governance guidelines to ensure a trustworthy and accountable AI ecosystem [8, 12], the practical implementation of supportive policies for deep-tech AI startups has lagged. The existing Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes, for instance, have primarily benefited sectors like mobile manufacturing and white goods, with deep-tech lines sketched on paper but not yet funded meaningfully.[6]

Intellectual property (IP) is another critical area. Between 2014 and 2023, India ranked fifth globally in generative AI patent filings, trailing significantly behind China and the United States.[6] This lower rate of patenting impacts how venture capitalists (VCs) value “defensible IP” in startups, often forcing Indian founders to focus on selling services rather than developing platform-level products with strong proprietary technology.[6] A lack of robust IP protection and targeted policy support for deep-tech can deter long-term investment and innovation, which are crucial for building globally competitive AI products.

Market Readiness and Slow Enterprise Adoption

Despite the high stated interest in AI from Indian companies, the market’s readiness for advanced AI solutions remains a challenge. Many AI startups are still at an experimental stage, lacking real-world deployment experience, while enterprises seek “battle-tested, production-ready AI”.[6] This leads to slow enterprise sales cycles and risk-averse corporate procurement practices, which can delay market penetration for startups.[6] Cultural resistance to change existing processes and hesitancy to invest without clear Return on Investment (ROI) further complicate go-to-market strategies.[6] This environment contributes to the “pivot or perish” dilemma for many Indian AI startups, making it difficult to achieve the necessary scale and longevity to become a giant.[13]

The combination of capital constraints, compute deficits, and an advanced talent shortage creates a “triple bottleneck” that fundamentally limits Indian AI companies from moving beyond the application/service layer to develop and scale foundational models. Building a foundational AI model requires immense capital, vast compute resources, and top-tier research talent. India’s current deficiencies in all three simultaneously create a structural impediment to competing at the “frontier AI” level. This means India’s current AI strategy, while effective for localized problem-solving and application development, is structurally constrained from producing global foundational AI leaders.

The “Free PoC Purgatory” and slow enterprise adoption indicate a market maturity issue and a risk-averse corporate culture that hinders rapid iteration and revenue generation for deep-tech startups. This suggests a disconnect between strategic intent and practical adoption, slowing down product-market fit and starving startups of crucial early revenue, making it difficult to build sustainable, scalable businesses. The Indian market, while large, may not yet be mature enough or sufficiently risk-tolerant to rapidly commercialize and scale deep-tech AI innovations.

Global AI Giants: Lessons from the US and China

To understand why India has yet to produce a global AI giant, it is instructive to examine the models adopted by the leading AI nations, the United States and China, and contrast them with India’s distinct approach.

The US Model: Private Sector Leadership and Frontier AI Focus

The United States maintains its AI supremacy through a decentralized ecosystem that champions private sector leadership. This model is characterized by exceptional academic excellence, with 57% of elite AI researchers globally originating from the US.[9] It is fueled by unparalleled venture capital dominance, attracting $109 billion in private AI investment in 2024 alone, and an annual private AI investment of $67.2 billion.[9, 7] This capital is often patient and willing to fund high-risk, long-term research.

US AI companies, particularly frontier AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic, are intensely focused on winning the race to build Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).[14] This ambition is supported by significant compute dominance, with the US possessing 5,200 petaflops of AI compute capacity, which is 35 times that of India.[9] Coupled with a strong talent retention rate, where 75% of US-trained AI PhDs remain in the country, the US leverages a robust ecosystem of academic research, abundant private capital, and a culture of high-risk, high-reward innovation, particularly in foundational models and AGI.[9] Effective AI implementation in these organizations also starts with fully committed C-suite leadership and an engaged board, indicating a top-down strategic approach to AI adoption and scaling.[15]

The China Model: State-Led Industrial Policy and Commercialization

China’s approach to AI leadership is distinct, characterized by a state-led industrial policy with centralized planning. The nation’s 2017 Next Generation AI Plan coordinates efforts among national champions like Baidu and Alibaba, backed by an impressive $137 billion in annual investment aimed at achieving global leadership.[9] China benefits from a substantial data advantage, generating 25% of global data compared to India’s 9%, which is crucial for training advanced AI models.[9]

This coordinated strategy has yielded tangible results: China files 2.5 times more AI patents than the US.[9, 16] Chinese companies tend to focus more on building models that can generate revenue today, demonstrating a strong commercialization drive.[14] Furthermore, China has actively pursued domestic production of 7nm semiconductors and algorithmic innovations to reduce reliance on Western hardware and circumvent export controls.[9] This top-down, coordinated strategy, combined with vast data resources and a focus on rapid commercialization and indigenous capabilities, has allowed China to become a full-spectrum peer competitor to the US, producing companies like DeepSeek AI.

India’s “Third Path”: Social Impact and Localized Solutions

India is carving out a unique “third path” in the global AI race, diverging from both the US’s private-sector-driven innovation and China’s state-directed industrial dominance. India’s strategy prioritizes “scalable, socially impactful applications tailored to its demographic and economic realities”.[9] This includes deploying AI in critical sectors like healthcare, where the AI market is valued at $7.5 billion, and agriculture, with initiatives like AgriStack digital twins.[3, 9] The focus also extends to developing indigenous foundational AI models like BharatGen, specifically tailored for Indian languages and leveraging the nation’s robust digital public infrastructure such as Aadhaar, UPI, and ONDC.[3, 5, 7]

This approach, while highly beneficial for societal impact and inclusive progress, implicitly means less direct competition in the global “frontier AI” race for AGI or general-purpose models, which are inherently capital and compute-intensive. The stark contrast in private AI investment and compute capacity between India and the US/China highlights that “giant” AI companies are fundamentally capital and infrastructure-intensive endeavors. India’s current investment levels and compute capacity are simply insufficient to foster companies operating at the scale required for developing large, general-purpose foundational AI models. The “third path” is a pragmatic response to these resource constraints, but it inherently means playing a different game than the “AGI race” pursued by US giants or the “industrial dominance” pursued by Chinese giants.

The success factors observed in the US and China—namely, abundant access to chips and compute power, massive data resources, patient capital, strong C-suite commitment to AI governance and implementation, and an enterprise-scale approach from the outset—directly mirror India’s identified challenges.[14, 15, 16, 17] This relationship between the success factors of global leaders and the challenges faced by India suggests that the absence of these foundational elements directly hinders India’s ability to cultivate AI giants. The “pivot or perish” dilemma faced by Indian startups further underscores the difficulty in achieving the necessary scale and longevity without these fundamental enablers.[13]

Paving the Way Forward: Recommendations for India’s AI Ambition

For India to transcend its current position as a vibrant AI hub and foster the emergence of global AI giants, a concerted and multi-pronged strategic approach is essential. Addressing the identified “missing links” requires synchronized efforts across various domains.

Strategic Investment: Foster Patient Capital for Deep-Tech and Foundational AI

The current funding landscape needs a significant shift. Beyond early-stage rounds and the “PoC purgatory,” there is a pressing need to attract and deploy patient, deep-tech capital.[6] This necessitates encouraging larger domestic and international venture capital funds, as well as institutional investors, to commit to the long-term, capital-intensive nature of foundational AI models and infrastructure development. Government incentives, co-investment models, and a clearer pathway for deep-tech startups to monetize their innovations can help bridge this funding gap.[1, 7, 6] Without substantial, sustained capital, Indian AI companies will struggle to compete with global players who have access to billions in funding.

Infrastructure Build-Out: Accelerate Indigenous Compute Capabilities and Affordable Access

Compute power is the fundamental fuel for AI innovation. It is imperative to expedite the deployment of the promised 18,693 GPUs under the IndiaAI Mission and to significantly expand indigenous supercomputing capabilities.[4, 6] More widespread and reliable access to highly subsidized GPU power (₹100/hour) for startups and researchers is crucial to democratize AI development.[3, 4] Furthermore, exploring and investing in domestic semiconductor manufacturing capabilities is vital to reduce India’s current 95% reliance on imports, thereby enhancing strategic autonomy and ensuring a robust supply chain for future AI infrastructure.[9] Bridging the massive compute gap with global leaders is non-negotiable for training large models and enabling cutting-edge research.

Talent Nurturing and Retention: Strengthen Advanced AI Education, Research, and Create Attractive Opportunities

A robust pipeline of top-tier AI talent, retained within the country, is essential for driving foundational innovation. This requires strengthening AI education programs, particularly at the doctoral level, to produce more advanced AI researchers capable of pushing the boundaries of the field.[9, 8] Strategies to curb brain drain are critical, including offering competitive salaries and research grants, and establishing world-class AI research institutions that can attract and retain top talent.[9, 8, 10] Additionally, a concerted effort to upskill the existing workforce is necessary to meet the surging demand for specialized AI skills, transforming the current talent pool into one capable of advanced AI development.[10, 11]

Robust Policy and Governance: Develop Clear, Supportive Regulations and IP Frameworks

Predictable and supportive regulatory environments, coupled with strong intellectual property protection, build investor confidence and provide a stable foundation for long-term growth. The swift finalization and implementation of clear, comprehensive AI governance frameworks that balance innovation with ethical considerations and data privacy are paramount.[8, 12] Furthermore, extending meaningful support, such as through Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes, specifically to deep-tech AI ventures, and strengthening intellectual property protection are vital to encourage patent filings and enhance startup valuations.[6] This will incentivize the creation of defensible, proprietary AI products rather than merely service-based businesses.

Industry-Academia-Government Collaboration: Emphasize Co-Innovation and Ecosystem Support

A collaborative ecosystem can significantly accelerate innovation and facilitate knowledge transfer. Encouraging early industry partnerships for talent access and co-innovation is crucial for startups to gain market insights and refine their offerings.[1, 2] Promoting more structured mentorship and acceleration programs, similar to initiatives like T-Hub MATH, can provide vital guidance in product development, business strategy, and scaling.[4] Fostering a culture of “thinking enterprise-scale from the start” and democratizing AI access through shared resources and platforms will enable more companies to transition from pilot projects to scaled production, ultimately contributing to the emergence of larger, more impactful AI entities.[17]

These recommendations, while distinct, are deeply interconnected and require a holistic, multi-pronged approach. Addressing one challenge in isolation (e.g., only compute) without addressing others (e.g., capital, talent) will likely yield limited results in fostering AI giants. Building a “giant” AI company is a complex undertaking that requires a confluence of factors: massive capital to fund R&D and operations, cutting-edge compute infrastructure to train models, and top-tier talent to innovate. Without patient capital, there is no funding for compute or talent. Without compute, talent cannot train large models. Without talent, capital and compute are underutilized. Without supportive policy, the environment remains uncertain. Therefore, these recommendations form a synergistic system; a “giant” cannot emerge from a single point of strength but from a robust, interconnected ecosystem that addresses all these foundational needs simultaneously.

Conclusion: The Road Ahead for India’s AI Journey

India’s AI landscape is characterized by immense potential, driven by its vast data ecosystem, a burgeoning digital public infrastructure, and a significant demographic dividend. The rapid growth in AI startups and the government’s ambitious vision underscore a nation poised for substantial advancements in the field.

However, the current absence of global AI giants in India stems from systemic challenges that collectively impede scaling to that level. These include a critical shortage of patient, deep-tech capital, a significant deficit in high-performance computing infrastructure, and a qualitative gap in advanced AI talent coupled with brain drain. Furthermore, policy implementation and intellectual property frameworks, while evolving, have not yet provided the tangible support necessary for deep-tech ventures to thrive and build defensible, globally competitive products.

The path forward for India to transition from a vibrant AI hub to a producer of global AI giants is not linear but a complex, multi-variable equation. It requires synchronized efforts across strategic investment, accelerated infrastructure build-out, dedicated talent nurturing and retention, robust policy and governance, and enhanced industry-academia-government collaboration. By systematically addressing these interconnected “missing links,” India can indeed carve its distinct and impactful niche in the global AI landscape, fostering companies that not only serve its unique domestic needs but also achieve a commanding presence on the world stage. The ambition is clear, and with focused, integrated execution, the emergence of India’s own AI giants is a tangible, albeit challenging, prospect.

This blog will feature posts about my projects, learning experiences, and thoughts on technology. Stay tuned for more content!